<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grand Canyon deserves respect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arkitectrue.com/grand-canyon-deserves-respect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arkitectrue.com/grand-canyon-deserves-respect/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=grand-canyon-deserves-respect</link>
	<description>ArkitecTrue is dedicated to architectural thinking by Yelda Horozoglu Gokdag</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.arkitectrue.com/grand-canyon-deserves-respect/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arkitectrue.com/?p=101#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Hi - I found your comments thought-provoking and insightful. I am a big fan of the Canyon and have always been concerned with the debate around &#039;Access versus Excess&#039; - the Sky Walk will doubtless increase access to the Canyon which is a positive since it involves sharing natural history. However, the fact that it is a permanent, man-made, obtrusive construction surely points to excess? What next, a theme park?

I&#039;m not sure if there is a solution to this problem but I am glad that you have articulated these concerns and provided a forum for others to do the same.

Best wishes,

Mark Taylor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I found your comments thought-provoking and insightful. I am a big fan of the Canyon and have always been concerned with the debate around &#8216;Access versus Excess&#8217; &#8211; the Sky Walk will doubtless increase access to the Canyon which is a positive since it involves sharing natural history. However, the fact that it is a permanent, man-made, obtrusive construction surely points to excess? What next, a theme park?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if there is a solution to this problem but I am glad that you have articulated these concerns and provided a forum for others to do the same.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>Mark Taylor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
