Stanislaus Kostka Church, St. Joseph’s Church, St. Patrick’s Church, and St. Mary’s Church. The churches, built between the late 19th and early 20th centuries, are considered architectural gems of the city’s Polish-American community. They are also significant for their role in the history of the Buffalo Diocese.
The landmark designation process is a complex and lengthy one, involving multiple stakeholders and a rigorous review process. The process begins with a nomination, followed by a review by the city’s Historic Preservation Commission, and ultimately, a vote by the city council. This process ensures that only truly significant buildings are designated as landmarks. The designation process also has a positive impact on the neighborhood. It can attract investment and revitalize the area, leading to the designation of other buildings as landmarks.
This statement reflects a shift in the diocese’s perspective on landmarking. Previously, the diocese had been more resistant to landmarking, viewing it as an unnecessary burden. However, the current situation, with the historic building facing potential demolition, has prompted a change in their stance. The diocese’s decision to accept the landmark designation is likely driven by a combination of factors. First, the potential for financial gain from tourism and preservation efforts. Second, the recognition of the building’s historical significance and the desire to preserve it for future generations. Third, the potential for legal protection against demolition.
“We will work very hard to ensure that the properties are sold at a fair price.”
This statement reflects a commitment to transparency and ethical conduct in the process of identifying and handling properties for potential mergers or closures. **Transparency:** The statement emphasizes the importance of open communication and clear information sharing throughout the process. This includes informing stakeholders about the potential for mergers or closures, the rationale behind these decisions, and the process for identifying and evaluating properties.
This concern is not just about aesthetics. The buildings, many of which are historic, have cultural and historical significance. They are not just empty shells; they are repositories of memories, stories, and traditions. These buildings have witnessed the city’s growth and evolution, serving as silent witnesses to the lives of countless people. They are a tangible reminder of the city’s past, a testament to the faith and dedication of the people who built them. The diocese’s proposed closures are raising concerns about the city’s future.
This summary provides a brief overview of the city landmark designation process. It highlights the initial approval by the Preservation Board and the subsequent vote by the Common Council. It also emphasizes the criteria that must be met for a building to be considered for landmark status. Let’s delve deeper into each of these aspects. **Preservation Board Approval:**
The Preservation Board, an independent body, plays a crucial role in the initial assessment of a building’s eligibility for landmark status. This board, composed of individuals with expertise in architecture, history, and preservation, reviews applications and provides recommendations to the Common Council. Their role is to ensure that the building meets the necessary criteria for landmark designation.
The application for the complex, which includes a church, rectory, and school, is seeking to be designated as a National Historic Landmark. The application argues that the complex is significant for its role in promoting labor rights and social justice. The application highlights the church’s history of supporting workers and advocating for their rights, dating back to the early 20th century.
